But I will try to make it easy for you. The problem is that to back up what I'm going to write, I really need about 17 pages of footnotes from years of study. But since you are the student, I will try to give you a start: The Constitution was an elitist document, in truth, only in terms of its creation, not its content.
A Sad Tale of Parchment Idolatry. Thirty nine of the fifty five delegates attending the Philadelphia Convention signed the document.
Their con job is evident from the very first line penned. It is, therefore, a patently Solar Cult document. This is because the date of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun ascends to its highest point in the zodiac. Above it on a stem hung a pyramid-shaped plant.
The whole is a Templar image. Their document served the American aristocracy, not the people.
In fact the document was never put before the people for ratification, and was openly opposed by the majority of men and women in the original thirteen states, who resisted coming together to form any kind of unified nation.
Facts of this sort have been deliberately concealed through the decades, but are now openly accepted by some mainstream American historians, such as Joseph Ellis, Thomas DiLorenzo, and others. The Constitutionalists were guileful traitors whose attendance at the Philadelphia Convention was kept secret for an entire generation.
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton - architects of monarchy in disguise The hypocrisy and duplicity of the Federalists is responsible for modern neo-imperialism and advent of the so-called New World Order.
In our opinion these men were little more than British agents, because King George himself - who declared eternal war on America - could not have done as much damage to America as their actions wrought.
Royce Hologram of Liberty When the duplicitous Hamilton was asked why he helped draft the Constitution, he guardedly replied: My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast.
He was but one member of the Philadelphia Convention who secretly resented the independence of America. One perceptive dissenter realized this and wrote: Both men were card-carrying Freemasons and Federalists.
They and their cohorts planned to subvert and destroy the American Republic, replacing it with an oligarchy.
Before that time, there was no such thing as a nation being ruled by a constitution. Countries were ruled by kings who granted some rights to the people. Yet governance by constitution had existed in Masonic lodges for hundreds of years - Sanford Holst Sworn in Secret: He was heavily influenced, as were many American politicians, by the philosophy of French aristocrat Baron de Montesquieu who believed in monarchy.
Madison was also influenced by the writings of British empiricist philosopher John Locke, himself "a major investor in the English slave trade through the Royal Africa Company. He openly advocated an anti-Republican ideology and commented on how illiterate masses should be divided and controlled: Where a majority are united by a common sentiment, and have an opportunity, the rights of the minor party become insecure.
In a republican government the majority, if united, have always an opportunity. However, his notes were not made public until four years after his death. Prior to their public release the notes had been thoroughly edited.
In fact the "People" referred to are not citizens of America, No! They are the elites who rule from within a legally separate precinct known as the District of Columbia. This district is under federal control and the government operating from within it is, legally speaking, a foreign institution.
It refers to the imperious overlords who have granted the Constitution to the masses within the "United States of America" - the non-sovereign nation under their control.The key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law, which has implications for minority rights.
Both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution or .
The Democratic-Republican Party (formally "The Republican Party") was an American political party formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison around to oppose the centralizing policies of the new Federalist Party run by Alexander Hamilton, who was secretary of the treasury and chief architect of George Washington's administration.
. Unformatted text preview: 10 Constitutional Government FRAMING THE CONSTITUTION: ELITIST OR DEMOCRATIC PROCESS? A remarkable fact about the United States government is that it has operated for years on the basis of a written Constitution.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. ~ Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Faith & Heritage is a consortium of Christian writers from a traditionalist perspective.
F&H features a diverse range of opinions among its writers, and any particular opinion expressed is not necessarily indicative of universal agreement among F&H admins or . Oct 22, · I don't believe the constitution is an elitist document, but rather a populist document that outlines the branches of government and the power that each holds.
I think what you are noting as a document that has given way to democratic tendencies and policies today, are really a separate issue where interpretation has heartoftexashop.com: Resolved.