To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. Most studies [to date have been] cross-sectional or rely on self-reported health. And, if you just ask people how they are, pot smokers may be like:
I am a big fan of your work on risk communication and have been following it for years.
I am currently researching best practice for communicating job layoffs, and wondered if you would apply your models to communicating bad news about jobs. For example, would this comment hold true in a job crisis?
More often than not, they are already pondering what might go wrong, imagining the worst and wishing there were some way to get it out onto the table and get the facts.
I would think that employees would be expecting layoffs. Speculating about when and who is a big part of the rumor mill in an organization, and people would rather know than constantly live in fear about what might happen.
So I think not telling them is very unproductive, and in our current economic climate irresponsible. Most companies tend to keep their employees in the dark.
Publicly listed companies have of course a regulatory framework to consider, but your risk communication model is an interesting one to contemplate. They mostly knew or sensed that a downsizing was on the way, and the event itself is like the other shoe dropping.
Would it be kinder — and better business — for employers to be candid? In the current economic climate, a very high percentage of employed people fear for their jobs. This is a huge drain on morale and productivity — and a significant threat to workplace safety as well.
It also inhibits consumption and damages the economy, as millions pull back on spending in anticipation of possible joblessness to come. The widespread expectation of joblessness is thus a self-fulfilling prophesy. Here are the four groups: These employees are experiencing completely unnecessary anxiety, with all its impacts on morale, productivity, safety, consumption, and quality of life.
If it were the norm for companies to level about their labor plans, these employees would enjoy a reprieve. The risk would be knowable, explicit, confirmed.
But when the layoffs come, they will be taken by surprise, logistically and emotionally. If their employer bothered to say so explicitly, it would simply confirm what they already believe.
Bottom line of this audience segmentation: Most employees are better off knowing whether layoffs are in the offing or not.
|Blow up dozens of clandestine airstrips used by planes laden with Colombian cocaine.|
|Matrix management This organisational type assigns each worker two bosses in two different hierarchies.|
|Army Corps of Engineers: Its projects maintain navigable channels, reduce flood and storm damage, and restore aquatic ecosystems.|
|Definition[ edit ] A marketing plan is a comprehensive document or blueprint that outlines a business advertising and marketing efforts for the coming year. It describes business activities involved in accomplishing specific marketing objectives within a set time frame.|
|Thinking Out Loud: Budd's Blog||However, much has happened since it went up, including the Blogger outage.|
No employees are worse off knowing. I understand that candor may have some downsides for an employer. And perhaps employees who knew that layoffs were coming rather than just fearing that layoffs might be coming would perform less well; they might focus on job-hunting, or take sick days, or even engage in a little pilfering or sabotage.
There are some ways in which it might be better for the employer to let the layoffs come as a shock: But at least in risk communication terms, candor about the prospect of layoffs is good strategy. Based on this distinction, I categorize risk communication into three tasks: The risk is both high-hazard and high-outrage; people are rightly upset about a genuinely serious risk.
Losing your job is a crisis. For that matter, knowing or suspecting that others in your organization are likely to lose their jobs is also a crisis, even if you are confident of keeping yours.
Layoff survivors suffer from survivor guilt; they must endure the disruption of the layoff itself and the pressure once the layoff is over to do more with less; they lose friends and acquaintances; they have reason to worry about the possibility of another layoff down the road. The two goals in crisis communication are to help people bear their feelings, especially their anger, fear, and misery — that is, their outrage — and to help them cope effectively with the serious hazard they face.
There is also a precaution advocacy element in talking about possible future layoffs. Employees who imagine that their job is more secure than it actually is are in a high-hazard, low-outrage situation. They need and deserve to be warned.NOTE: If you want to tell me I'm full of crap SEND COMMENTS TO [email protected] THINKING OUT LOUD.
13 Sept 18 - Tail Wagging the Dog. This web page is dedicated to our good friend, retired armored vehicle engineer Bill Criswell who passed away a few years ago. A courageous and wise voice of reason against the wheeled truck madness infecting the Army and DoD, the picture above was his favorite of 11 th Combat Engineers leading the way into Baghdad using M .
is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.
UN News produces daily news content in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Kiswahili, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish, and weekly programmes in Hindi, Urdu and Bangla.
Our multimedia service, through this new integrated single platform, updates throughout the day, in text, audio and video – also making use of quality images and other media . The recruitment is a crucial step for P&G and especially into the CBD structure. The objective is to find the right person, for the right place, at the right time.
Conversely, in case of trouble, the customer can easily contact a staff member. Download-Theses Mercredi 10 juin